Analysis of Business Problem(EYE IN SKY)

What is the crux of the dilemma here?

They had an information deficit and if theyhad engaged in that environment, they would not have control over the aftermath. Relevant information gathering is crucial to any decision making.The movie “Eye in the Sky” presents a moral dilemma regarding the use of drones in modern warfare and also revolves around a decision to launch a drone strike to eliminate a group of terrorists elshabab who was planning a suicide bombing in Nairobi, Kenya. Susan Helen Dan ford (British born) and kahadi are no 4&5 on the list, of east Africa of the most wanted person.

The mission involves a British drone pilot, American drone operators, a Kenyan(nairabio) ground surveillance team, and British military commanders, all monitoring the situation from different locations around the world in order to capture these individuals. As the operation unfolds, a young girl enters the target area, creating a dilemma for the decision-makers as to whether to proceed with the strike, given the high likelihood that the girl will be killed as collateral damage.

The central question of the movie is whether the moral and legal costs of killing an innocent girl are worth the potential benefits of eliminating the terrorists and preventing the loss of many more innocent lives. The characters’ perspectives on this issue vary, leading to tense debates and difficult decisions.

What do you observe about the team composition in COBR(A) – Cabinet Office Briefing Room?They came to witness a capture and not a target assassination as approved by the attorney general. Also no one wanted to take responsibility for the aftermath of whatever decision that was made. They want her to be brought back to stand trial. The team composition in the COBR room highlights the complex and interdependent nature of our modern-day environment, with different experts providing their expertise and perspectives to guide decision-making. The team members’ varying opinions and concerns create a tense and thought-provoking situation that explores the ethical and practical challenges of decision making.

The team is tasked with making a crucial decision about whether or not to authorize a drone strike(hell fire) on a terrorist cell in Nairobi, Kenya based on the new development.Bottom of Form

For instance, the lieutenant (Benson) and intelligence officer (colonel Powell) are advocating for the strike and believes that the potential benefits of taking out the terrorists outweigh the risks of collateral damage.

The British Attorney General, who is responsible for providing legal advice on the strike. He initially supports the strike but becomes increasingly concerned about the potential legal implications of collateral damage.

Steve Watts (Aaron Paul): The American drone pilot responsible for carrying out the strike. He is the one who is most directly impacted by the decision, as he is the one who will have to push the button to launch the missile.

What do you notice about the extended team / supporting team (Nevada Air Force base: the pilot and his assistant, and the lady in the Hawaii base), in terms of who they are and their responses to the situation? The Pilot and his assistant: The pilot and his assistant play a critical role in the operation, as they are responsible for controlling the missile that will be used to strike the target. They are initially skeptical of the mission but follow orders and prepare to launch the missile when instructed to do so. However, they hesitate when they realize that a young girl has entered the kill zone, which leads to a delay in the strike.

The Lady in the Hawaii base: The lady in the Hawaii base is responsible for operating the drone that is used for surveillance. She is initially hesitant to launch the drone but does so when instructed to do so by her superiors. As she watches the scene unfold, she becomes emotionally invested in the situation, and argues passionately against launching the missile when she realizes that a young girl is in danger.

Overall, the extended team in the movie plays a crucial role in the operation, and their responses to the situation are complex and nuanced. They are not just passive actors following orders but are actively engaged in the decision-making process and express their own opinions and concerns. The movie shows that even those who are not physically present at the site of the operation can have a significant impact on its outcome, and that their reactions and responses are influenced by their own personal values and experiences.

To be continued.