General

Analysis of Business Problems(EYE IN THE SKY 3)

Written by Halimatu Adams · 2 min read >

Do you notice any cognitive biases in the movie? Who, What, when where and how?

Throughout the movie, various characters tend to focus on information that confirms their pre-existing beliefs or assumptions. For example, Lt. Gen. Benson is focused on the potential benefits of the strike, while Attorney General Willett is more concerned about the legal implications of collateral damage. They tend to interpret new information in a way that supports their pre-existing viewpoints.

After the decision to launch the missile is made, the characters tend to evaluate the success or failure of the mission based on the outcome. This outcome bias can affect how they perceive the decision-making process and the quality of the decision itself.

What can we learn from this movie about why teams might fail or succeed, especially in high-pressure environments? 

Clear Roles and Responsibilities: In high-pressure environments, it is essential that team members understand their roles and responsibilities. In the movie, each member of the COBR team had a clear job to do, and their responsibilities were well-defined. This allowed for more efficient decision-making and execution.

Effective Communication: Communication is critical in high-pressure environments. The COBR team in the movie had established communication channels that allowed them to quickly exchange information and make decisions. Effective communication also allowed them to adapt quickly to changes in the situation.

Flexibility and Adaptability: In high-pressure environments, things can change rapidly, and teams must be flexible and adaptable. The COBR team in the movie had to adjust their plans multiple times as the situation evolved, demonstrating the importance of being able to pivot quickly in response to new information.

Collaboration and Trust: High-pressure environments require team members to trust one another and work collaboratively. The COBR team in the movie had to rely on each other’s expertise and judgment to make critical decisions. Trust was especially important in situations where team members were not physically co-located.

Effective Leadership: Leadership is essential in high-pressure environments, as it sets the tone for the team and provides guidance and direction. In the movie, Col. Powell provided clear leadership, making difficult decisions and leading the team through a challenging and emotionally charged situation.

Overall, the movie highlights the importance of teamwork, communication, flexibility, collaboration, and leadership in high-pressure environments. It underscores the importance of having clear roles and responsibilities, effective communication channels, and trust among team members. It also shows how effective leadership can make a difference in stressful situations and how teams can adapt and succeed despite challenging circumstances.

Other than the context of war, what other sort of situations do you see these kinds of stalemate occurring?

Crisis Management: In a crisis, decision-makers may face difficult trade-offs and have to balance competing priorities. For example, in a natural disaster, emergency responders may have to decide whether to prioritize rescuing people in immediate danger or providing aid to those who are less urgently in need.

Business Decision-Making: In a corporate setting, executives may face difficult choices that involve balancing the interests of different stakeholders. For instance, a company may have to decide whether to prioritize short-term profits or long-term sustainability and social responsibility.

Political Decision-Making: Political leaders may have to make tough decisions that involve balancing the interests of different constituents. For example, a government may have to decide whether to prioritize economic growth or social welfare, or how to respond to a crisis that affects multiple countries or regions.

Healthcare Decision-Making: In healthcare, decisions may involve balancing patient autonomy and quality of life with the risks and benefits of different treatment options. For instance, doctors may have to decide whether to prioritize pain relief or avoid potentially addictive pain medications.

These are just a few examples of contexts in which decision-makers may face difficult trade-offs and have to balance competing priorities. In all of these situations, effective decision-making requires careful consideration of the available information, clear communication, and a willingness to adapt and adjust plans as new information emerges.

Tell me what you think about it.

Happiness: A Unique Inside Job!

Yemi Alesh in General
  ·   1 min read

Leave a Reply